Toastmasters & Etc.

Listening * Thinking * Public Speaking * Self Improvement

4 Responses

Subscribes to this post Comment Rss or TrackBack URL
Pat Farrell says,
in 5-27-2008 @ 09:48:02    

John,

Amen. I feel strongly about this issue. Our club tried it and I dropped out until they gave it up. We’re not selling frickin’ Amway here. No need to be that regimental. All your points are well stated.

Pat Farrell

Public Speaking Blog Articles: Week in Review [2008-05-31] says,
in 5-30-2008 @ 23:18:52    

[…] Spaith passionately argues that the VP-Education should create a schedule manually. Auto-scheduling doesn’t provide the vast time savings it’s supposed to, it establishes bad […]

Jason Black says,
in 6-2-2008 @ 14:15:56    

John Says:

> it doesn’t give members the freedom to set their own pace of development

While I think most of your points in this speech are spot on, I have to disagree with this one. Anyone who wants to progress through the manuals (particularly the CC) faster than the club’s scheduling algorithm would ordinarily allow has plenty of ways to do so. They can ask the VPE to schedule them more frequently. Or, they can simply be pro-active about it: write and prepare their speeches ahead of time in order to be ready to fill in for last minute drop-outs.

I made heavy use of that last technique while I was doing my CC because I had a personal goal of finishing the manual within one year. I never had any problems finding an empty speaking slot when I wanted one, and hey, filling in for a vacancy makes you the hero! Can’t beat that. :)

Shawn Levasseur says,
in 6-13-2008 @ 10:50:25    

Since you mentioned drop-outs being a problem with auto scheduling, I’d like to run something by you that I did in a club when I was VP-Ed.

We had two hour meetings, but we had a stretch where a variety of people had to miss meetings at the last second, and we were rather thin on speakers.

In response to this I added a new role to the meeting sign-up sheet. It was for someone to sign up to speak if one of the scheduled speakers couldn’t make it (or if the speaker slots weren’t otherwise filled)

In a tip of the hat to both the “ice breaker” speech and the idea that this slot was to be used in emergencies, I called this the “glass breaker” slot.

Your critique of auto-scheduling certainly got me thinking that having a glass breaker would be like giving permission for speakers to drop out, (though in my club, it already was a problem, I wouldn’t have worried about that at that point)